For anyone in or interested in the tourism industry to explore issues associated with branding a country, region, destination, attraction, hotel, tour etc

167 Members
Join Us!

7 of the Top Destination Brands of the Year

  Visit Maldives Over the past decades, destinations in Europe, North America, and the Caribbean have been the stars in both destination branding and popularity among travelers. And while all the above certainly remain among the world´s most powerful performers in tourism, the World Travel Awards (dubbed “the Oscars of travel”) in 2023 have underscored strong showings outside these traditional areas, particularly in Asia and the Middle East. Here´s a quick rundown of this year´s winners: read…

Read more…
0 Replies

How brands can manage a travel-industry crisis like coronavirus

Travel isn’t always a bed of roses. There are natural disasters, tainted products, bad actors, data breaches, regional and global viruses, and events big and small that require industries to step up, speak up, and do whatever it takes to care of their employees and customers.  As the coronavirus outbreak tops more than 135,000 in some 140 countries, it’s an appropriate time to offer advice on how to handle an industry crisis. read post

Read more…
0 Replies

Cross-border migration and tourism

All across the world - Europe, the United States, Australia, Asia, and elsewhere - immigration and refugees are hot topics. But little attention has been paid to how this issue meshes with the other great mass movement of our era: tourism. An integral part of tourism is the exchange of cultures and the appreciation of the “other”, and the industry is often dependent on "importing” guest workers from abroad, who provide needed services and often also give a sense of the exotic…

Read more…
0 Replies

You need to be a member of Tripatini to add comments!

Join Tripatini

Comments are closed.

Comments

  • Paul

    1. I guess you'll never be a 'core' target market for Shakespeare Country. Fringe? Perhaps.

    2. Cork: They've obviously done an amazing marketing job on you. But there are hundreds of places around the world that have fantastic coastlines & scenery, authentic food & hospitality & cozy guesthouses. There's something else - perhaps buried deep within your sub-conscious - that attracts you to Cork - something very unique about the Brand Ireland in general and Cork in particular? Maybe it's The Craic (and I'm not talking about the white stuff).

    3. The Target is NOT the Market
    - Long answer: Coming soon...
    - Short answer: Think Wimbledon targetted at tennis fans but also full of visitors who have never touched a tennis racket in their lives. And Glastonbury targetted at the youth market but chocka with 50+ hippies re-living their second youth - but this time round with fatter wallets and waistlines to match in their posh marquees complete with chef at £6K per weekend. Rock-on Man!
  • Alan, I don't get the point about, "The Target is NOT the Market". Could you explain explain the question? Re the sub-brands for Warks, thats all news to me. I guess I know of the castle, and Shakespeare. I can't say I recall having seen any campaigns for either the main brand or sub-brands. And, the Shakespeare connection alone would not make me want to visit, I am not much into Shakespeare. I am not sure what that actually says about the success or otherwise of their strategy. I can say that when I travel I visit places that will offer me several experiences and activities to choose from. I sually want to know there are interesting things to see and do, good places to stay and eat and so on. One thing only is not going to get me there. I am pretty sold on Cork in Ireland. They have told me stories of fantastic coastline scenery, great hospitality, amazing authentic food and cozy small guest houses etc. How is it I know so much about Cork and so little about Warwickshire?
  • Paul, thanks for the heads up on amazon.com which got me thinking about another related subject for debate and discussion in the future perhaps:

    The Target is NOT the Market
    Does a single, narrowly-focused target such as ShakespeareWallah's (A BritRaj term for people who 'love' all things Shakespearean) attract a wider audience ie. beyond its narrow scope?

    Meanwhile, here's how 'Shakespeare Country' uses its
    Sub-Brands to attract different market segments:

    - Rugby: Home of the Sport of Rugby
    - Royal Leamington Spa: A Royal Town Twin (Twinned with Royal Tunbridge Wells in the county of Kent: The Garden of England)
    - Nuneaton: Home to the Warks Carnival (Warks is shorthand for Warwickshire)
    - Warwick Castle: England's Most Haunted (Featuring the Ghost Tower)
    - Warwick University: Leaders in Industry Innovation
  • It is interesting that just by our conversation Amazon.com has managed to associate itself and leave a panel ad of related books on this page. If Amazon can do it, Maybe Warwikshire County could too, and likewise for stories other than Shakespeare, so that Warwickshire is promoted to people according to their interest.
  • Hello Tripatinos

    To develop Jose's point about 'Shakespeare Country', here's how a single-minded big brand idea transfoms itself into a powerful future-focused story-telling extravaganza on multiple-media channels - from offline to online to mobile (cellphone).

    Let's say Jose, your earliest knowledge of 'England' generally and 'Shakespeare' specifically was during your most impressionable years - 7/8 years of age. In other words, 'Shakespeare' is currently residing deep within your sub-conscious - the part of your brain which actually influences your decision-making - but you are not conscious of that on a day-to-day basis. So any focus group that you participate in would not be able to 'extract' that bit of insight from you. Only a 'regression' into your early childhood would be able to do that. And let's say that one of your major roles in life is as a 'Business Person'.

    So here are some ways that 'Shakespeare Country' influences the 'business' target market - of which you are a part of - by re-telling Shakespeare's plays and sonnets but within a contemporary business context: Power, Strategy, Identity, Persuasion, Mergers & Acquisitions, Presentation, Creative Partnerships and so on.

    Here are some examples:
    1. Richard III: The Art of Persuasion
    2. Antony & Cleopatra: A Presentation Masterclass
    3. The Merchant of Venice: Mass Storytelling & the Power of Advertising
  • Good points, Paul. I just realized we're talking about apples and oranges, though.

    One thing is a slogan or tagline for a destination. Another is your online and offline marketing campaign to raise awareness and drive sales. You have one slogan, of course, and multiple approaches depending on whom you're marketing to.

    I would say that a focused tagline, especially for a smaller place like Warwickshire, works for me. It's an anchor in my overstretched mind. Now I know Warwickshire exists. Then, an effective campaign on different sites, coupled with offline ad & editorial, can expand on the message of that tagline to introduce me to other aspects of Warwickshire.

    Make sense?
  • Jose,
    And, is the objective just to make you remember the place, or to give you enough reasons to want to visit? I would argue that if your interest in Shakespeare was reason enough to visit you would probably already know that Warwickshire is Shakespeare Country? Personally I rarely find one reason compelling enough to visit a place, do you?

    The other point to make is that the more stories a place has to offer as content on the destination website, the more it's likely to attract online searchers. I don't think it is about overloading people with campaign messages. These days, people are active researchers looking for information, inspiration etc.

    The Recife guide I first created as a blog was meant to be a hobby. I never marketed it in any way. The content alone started to generate requests for more information, for tours etc. As a result my audience was self-selecting. Had I identified market segments, bought relevant keywords and done some PR work, this story telling approach would have been even more effective. I am now back in the UK and not actively developing Recife Guide at the moment, still the content is bringing in a consistently level of traffic, which is increasing slowly. I also still get enquiries. This would not happen if I was telling only one story, of that I am certain.
  • I agree with Monique. ;-)

    Seriously, I can assure you guys if there's one thing I'll remember even on my deathbed, it's that Warwickshire is Shakespeare Country. That has been etched into my memory in the "Permanent Albeit Not Immediately Useful" folder... a mere couple of days after the first time I ever heard it. Had the message been more diluted, which oftentimes means "more generic," I doubt I'd remember it even now.
  • I agree with both Paul and Alan, but in different contexts. For national or larger destinations such as New York, a single Big Idea proves too limiting. So there it makes sense to develop customer-oriented messaging appealing to different sectors. In the case of smaller, lesser known destinations such as the individual English counties, however, it may be wise to find one key message ("Shakespeare Country") that people can take away for each destination. In another words, if there's ONE thing we want people to remember about Warwickshire County, what is it? That it's Shakespeare Country.

    I think we are all WAY too bombarded by and overwhelmed with information on a daily basis, what with Facebook and Twitter and LinkedIn and newsfeeds and blogs to read, etcetera ad nauseam. Our attention spans are getting shorter. Our memories are suffering. Do we really have room in our frazzled brains for more complex messaging on one English county? And how many counties are in the US? And how many provinces in Spain? And cities in Germany? In these cases, I think it makes more sense to focus on the one Unforgettable Message each destination offers.

    Otherwise it will all be a jumble in our minds.
  • Cool Britannia was not a deliberate campaign initially, but a phrase used by a journalist in an American magazine, as I mentioned earlier. It, like tourism and general interest in the UK, was naturally London-centric, and I am not sure there is much chance of getting away from that.

    I disagree that being called 'Cool' makes you 'Uncool', but calling yourself 'Cool' would for sure.

    As for the Single-Focus regional branding idea, I still can't really see the sense in it. In the case of London, do people believe it to be "The Worlds Creative Capital"? For some people it maybe, and that may be a reason to visit. But just as many people, probably the vast majority, do not see it that way and visit for other reasons. They say that the brand exist in the mind of the consumer. For many travelers the brand London is already a firmly established concept. Changing that will not be easy.

    To my mind the job of marketing is to understand how target markets and segments currently perceive London and then develop appropriate campaigns to improve or modify them. In other words a more customer focused approach. And, the single big idea approach, unless it is broad enough to have widespread appeal, just isn't consumer focused, or sensitive to existing perceptions.

    Related to this issue is the fact that brands are not made or changed by one campaign. The brand that already exist in the customers mind is layer upon layer of information from many sources that are gathered over long periods of time. It is for this reason that perceptions are hard to change, and why the icons that trigger memories and associations are so powerful. It is why one big idea just will not resonate with many people. The images of heritage, royalty, pomp and ceremony etc related to London will be far stronger in the minds on many, far stronger than any notion of it being the 'World's Creative Capital'.
This reply was deleted.