From NMT Images |
HuffPost Travel, the newly launched travel vertical of the Huffington Post, recently ran into a blitz of criticism from professional travel writers.
In a wide-ranging interview with HuffPost Travel editor, Kate Auletta, writer Chris Gray Faust, of travel blog, Chris Around the World , asked Auletta a series of questions near and dear to the hearts of travel bloggers and journalists everywhere: Are you accepting submissions from travel bloggers? What's the application process and is there any compensation.
Auletta made it clear she was looking for "more voices," saying " the more voices the better...but there is no compensation for our writers, however."
Many travel writers are accustomed to providing content for nothing, but only to high value sites, because they believe it will drive traffic to their own sites, and the exposure will generate paying gigs.
But then Auletta added that, relative to photography, she requires "the rights to absolutely everything."
Things went from bad to worse when she said she did not allow HuffPost Travel writers to even take press trips, a position that seems now to be in flux.
Interestingly, she did not say HuffPost Travel required an exclusive or "first on," leading several writers to say they'd publish to their own blog sites or paying sites first, then to Auletta's
Nevertheless, the response to her comments was immediate and sharp.
One comment on Faust's post said since Huffington Post was valued at 150 million dollars why couldn't they pay their writers? And why require all rights to photographs, and not allow their writers to take press trips?
Another said, "I doubt Kate (Auletta) is working for free," while another writer compared Auletta's policy to that of house cleaners who "come and do my housework... bring their own cleaning equipment...will not be allowed to offer their cleaning services elsewhere. They will receive no compensation, and must pay for a taxi to get to my house rather than using subsidised public transport."
Reportedly the Huffington Post gets about 40 million unique visitor's a month, making the writers' lament, "why would they want us to work for nothing?" that much more pointed.
The overall sense is that HuffPost Travel is a work in progress, and Auletta, who was lured away from the WSJ's magazine, will rethink and reevaluate her policies, if not regarding compensation, then at least regarding rights and press rips, the back bone of most professional travel journalists.
Auletta's favorite destination? Barbuda, sister island to Antigua. A good place to escape the frustrations of travel writers.
Comments
I don't think Auletta has had much experience in the travel space so we'll see. The good news is they have not asked for an exclusive so will take content previously published via or not via a press trip.
Thanks for writing in
KS
. Amusing to see staffers of "no freebie" pubs, scarfing free lunches and strashering airline local ticketing offices for free upgrades.
Oh, well. That fight is long gone and most of us have moved on. Thanks for writing in, Mary
But I was saying it's up to us to monetize our content. The model of pay for content is dying, if not dead. It's perfectly possible to generate good, hard cash by leveraging your content and not expecting some third party to pay you. We do well by letting our content "carry" revenue-generating options: paid and free media, a la carte services.
But I've been having this conversation with SATW ( a shadow of its former self for this reason) for years now. Literally.
Thanks for writing it!
KS
We have entered the new age of monetizing our content . Pay me for a product placement in our TVPs. Pay for a link in my blog. Pay for an upload to a high value site. The idea of my standing in line for a check for my work is very traditional and very old world. That is, old world as of a year ago or two,
Still, Huff Post should pay for the content AND be a partner in the monetizing of the content, which finally is up to the writer.
Good to hear from you!!
I've been a publisher. If you would work for another publication/website/blog/outlet for free, why should I expect to have to pay you? Working for free is not a sustainable form of marketing or networking or any other delusional heading you wish to justify it under.
If your price is "free" then that's how much respect you'll get from editors and publishers.
For years I've heard from start-ups about "once they get going" they'll be able to share the wealth. Bullshit. Most never get going. In the case of the Huffington Post, it's owned by a very wealthy woman who is seems to have near-oracle status among some in the new and old media. But how many of those people in the inner circle in Washington whose friendship and favour she courts know she doesn't pay writers? It's not just travel writers, I understand that most columnists for the Post also aren't paid. How does this very wealthy woman justify that? And why don't people who interview her and her editors ask that question?
If I'm an entrepreneur and you will work for me for free, what is the impetus to pay you? Threaten to leave? So what, there are lots of others willing to step in.
This illustrates that travel writing is populated by far too many people who haven't a business sense (some of us do, but too, too many don't) and by dabblers. If you can afford to write for free or for "the trip", then how serious a writer are you? Okay, you may think you're serious about your writing, but you have the luxury of a spousal/companion's income or a pension to live off and pay the real bills.
Gawd, this makes my blood boil.