A shocking report by the Associated Press claims that 100 or more sled dogs in Canada were shot and had their throats slit because of a slowdown in tourism.
The British Columbia Society Prevention Cruelty to Animals reported that a company called Outdoor Adventures Whistler expected more dog-sledding business in a post-Olympics tourism activity, and when the anticipated boom never happened, the dogs were killed last April.
The grisly story came to light according to MSNBC when an employee of the company applied for worker’s compensation saying he “suffered post-traumatic stress after shooting the dogs and slitting their throats.”
Outdoor Adventure Whistler is the parent company of Howling Dog Tours Whistler, which offers popular dog sled tours in the winter.
The reaction from the Vancouver Humane Society was swift.
Debra Probert, executive director, called for a ban on dog sledding as a tourist activity.
MSNBC reported Probert said that society is not willing to accept that animals, particularly dogs should be killed because they are surplus or don’t suit the purpose for which they were born.”
While Probert said that the horrific incident is “the tip of the iceberg,” others said they were shocked because it was rare.
A Minneapolis couple that owns a dog-sledding business said that they had never heard the likes of it before and “the magnitude is so shocking, our heads are reeling.”
The employee responsible for killing the dogs has not been charged, but the California-based Animal League Defense Fund is offering Canadian prosecutors money for forensics and witnesses, and asking its members to write calling for a cancellation of the world-famous Iditarod (which I saw, and questioned) ) scheduled for March 5.
Comments
Murray. I base the comment on logic. Any deed is almost never an isolated deed, one of a kind. A bad cop, a misguided dog killer, a soldier who abuses civilians, a bullying teacher...these are never isolated examples of humans gone awry. The same applies to good deeds.
Now, I sense a bit of a belligerent tone, and so I'm bowing out of this conversation on lne. Perhaps when we meet we can have a drink and talk further.
Take care
Kaaleel
>>I can't believe this is an isolated example.<<
And what do you base that belief on?? How long have you been associated with sled dog sports???
S
Seems, say "seems" like one bad apple but where there's smoke there's fire. I can't believe this is an isolated example. So, does that make it 2 or 5 or 12 bad apples? At what point is one bad apple enough.
Well this was a strange reply. Apples, smoke, fire,?
Thanks, David!
Kaleel
That's the same old argument, Murray, when they banned Greyhound racing in Massachusetts. They turned the track into a casino and reemployed the workers.
Regarding factories that abuse humans to male a profit e.g. swet shops, etc. possibly.
Though, as I said, I much prefer education and effective laws to punitive closings
Cheers
I'm sure "getting real" is a matter of interpretation. While I'm inclined to agree with you that better and more effective laws are the way to go, this is also an emotional issue for may people and "getting real" for them is banning any sport that has the potential to put the welfare of animals second to profits
Thanks for writing in
ks