Not much new in here that journalists/freelancer writers didn't already know. What still makes me gasp though is the growing acceptance of the breakdown of the wall between editorial and advertising. The business side has always tried any means possible to cross over it in order to make a buck, but those on the writer/editor side seem to be giving in now too. Does anyone else believe that the desired quality consumer -- whether reading a print publication or an online article -- values objectivity and separation of the two sides? The only people I know who admit to reading articles labeled "Special Advertorial Section" or "Sponsored Content" are publishers/ad sales people.
You need to be a member of Tripatini to add comments!
Replies
Let me say something now that is very cynical, and I certainly invite you or anyone else to swat it down: Is it possible that the reason people don't read advertorial is not because they understand the ad-edit divide, but because the print is too small?
This is from Salon today:
[I'm posting a lightly edited text of the talk I gave Friday at
Stanford Law School's "Future of
Journalism: Unpacking the Rhetoric" conference. As you will
see, I took seriously the concept of unpacking the rhetoric, and
tried to answer the questions on
the event's agenda.]